Method and system for opportunity identification in cognitive decision making process

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure relates to opportunity sensing system(s) and method(s) to identify a business opportunity from a set of business opportunities associated with an organization for cognitive decision-making process. In one embodiment, the method comprises receiving a set of batch data associated with a set of symptoms indicative of a business opportunity from a set of business opportunities associated with an organization and obtaining metadata data associated with the business opportunity. The method further comprises detecting one or more symptoms for the set of symptoms based on analysis of the first set of data and the metadata and generating a reason associated with the detected one or more symptom based on execution of a root cause analysis methodology using the metadata data. The method furthermore comprises identifying a business opportunity from the set of business based on the generated reason.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application claims priority from U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 62/410,746 filed on Oct. 20, 2016, the entirety of whichis hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure in general relates to the field of cognitivecomputing. More particularly, the present subject matter relates to asystem and a method to identify a business opportunity from a set ofbusiness opportunities associated with an organization for cognitivedecision-making process.

BACKGROUND

Now a day, to survive and grow in an increasingly complex globaleconomy, organizations strive to find newer and newer methods to improvetheir performance and competitiveness. Most businesses, large and small,sought to improve business performance by streamlining their processes.The trend has been fueled by digitization, internet of things, anddevelopments in advanced analytics.

Pattern recognition is a branch of machine learning that focuses on therecognition of patterns and regularities in data, although it is in somecases considered to be nearly synonymous with machine learning.Generally, conventional methods and systems based on known patternrecognition methodologies, for business improvements, fail to understandopportunities in business when implemented in the context of modernbusinesses. This is due to the transient nature of businessopportunities and also due to the diffusion of predictors acrossmultiple dynamic streams of data. In particular, the conventionalmethods and systems are unable to sense opportunity in a cognitivedecision-making process.

SUMMARY

Before the present a system and a method to identify a businessopportunity from a set of business opportunities associated with anorganization for cognitive decision making process, are described, it isto be understood that this application is not limited to the particularsystems, and methodologies described, as there can be multiple possibleembodiments, which are not expressly illustrated in the presentdisclosures. It is also to be understood that the terminology used inthe description is for the purpose of describing the particularimplementations, versions, or embodiments only, and is not intended tolimit the scope of the present application. This summary is provided tointroduce aspects related to a system and a method to identify abusiness opportunity from a set of business opportunities associatedwith an organization for cognitive decision-making process. This summaryis not intended to identify essential features of the claimed subjectmatter nor is it intended for use in determining or limiting the scopeof the claimed subject matter.

In one embodiment, a method to identify a business opportunity from aset of business opportunities associated with an organization forcognitive decision making process is disclosed. In the embodiment, themethod comprises the step of receiving a set of batch data associatedwith a set of symptoms indicative of a business opportunity from a setof business opportunities associated with an organization. In oneexample, each of the one or more symptoms comprises a pattern andinstruction to collate data associated with the pattern. In one otherexample, the set of batch data may comprise data filtered from areal-time stream of data based on the one or more symptoms. Uponreceiving, the method comprises the step of obtaining metadata dataassociated with the business opportunity. In one example, the metadatacomprises one or more of historical data associated with the symptom.Further to obtaining, the method comprises the step of detecting one ormore symptoms for the set of symptoms based on analysis of the first setof data and the metadata and generating a reason associated with thedetected one or more symptom based on execution of a root cause analysismethodology using the metadata data. Subsequent to generating, themethod comprises the step of identifying a business opportunity from theset of business based on the generated reason.

In another embodiment, a system to identify a business opportunity froma set of business opportunities associated with an organization forcognitive decision-making process is disclosed. The system comprises amemory and a processor coupled to the memory, further the processor maybe configured to execute programmed instructions stored in the memory.In one embodiment, the system may receive a set of batch data associatedwith a set of symptoms indicative of a business opportunity from a setof business opportunities associated with an organization. In oneexample, each of the one or more symptoms comprises a pattern andinstruction to collate data associated with the pattern. In one moreexample, the set of batch data may comprise data filtered from areal-time stream of data based on the one or more symptoms. Further, thesystem may obtain metadata data associated with the businessopportunity. In one example, the metadata comprises one or more ofhistorical data associated with the symptom. Furthermore, the system maydetect one or more symptoms for the set of symptoms based on analysis ofthe first set of data and the metadata and generate a reason associatedwith the detected one or more symptom based on execution of a root causeanalysis methodology using the metadata data. Subsequently, the systemmay identify a business opportunity from the set of business based onthe generated reason.

In yet another implementation, non-transitory computer readable mediumembodying a program executable in a computing device for sensing ofopportunity in a cognitive decision-making process is disclosed. Theprogram may comprise a program code for receiving a set of batch dataassociated with a set of symptoms indicative of a business opportunityfrom a set of business opportunities associated with an organization. Inone example, each of the one or more symptoms may comprise a pattern andinstruction to collate data associated with the pattern. In one otherexample, the set of batch data may comprise data filtered from areal-time stream of data based on the one or more symptoms. The programmay comprise a program code for obtaining metadata data associated withthe business opportunity. In one example, the metadata may comprise oneor more of historical data associated with the symptom. The program maycomprise a program code for detecting one or more symptoms for the setof symptoms based on analysis of the first set of data and the metadata.The program may comprise a program code for generating a reasonassociated with the detected one or more symptom based on execution of aroot cause analysis methodology using the metadata data. The program maycomprise a program code for identifying a business opportunity from theset of business based on the generated reason.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing detailed description of embodiments is better understoodwhen read in conjunction with the appended drawing. For the purpose ofillustrating the disclosure, there is shown in the present documentexample constructions of the disclosure; however, the disclosure is notlimited to the specific methods and apparatus disclosed in the documentand the drawings.

The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanyingfigure. In the figure, the left-most digit(s) of a reference numberidentifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. Thesame numbers are used throughout the drawings to refer like features andcomponents.

FIG. 1 illustrates a network implementation of an opportunity sensingsystem to identify a business opportunity from a set of businessopportunities associated with an organization for cognitive decisionmaking process is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 2 illustrates the opportunity sensing system to identify a businessopportunity from a set of business opportunities associated with anorganization for cognitive decision-making process, in accordance withan embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 illustrates a message flow in the opportunity sensing system, inaccordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 illustrates a message flow in the opportunity detection system,in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 illustrates a method to identify a business opportunity from aset of business opportunities associated with an organization forcognitive decision making process, in accordance with an embodiment ofthe present disclosure

The figure depicts an embodiment of the present disclosure for purposesof illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize fromthe following discussion that alternative embodiments of the structuresand methods illustrated herein may be employed without departing fromthe principles of the disclosure described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Some embodiments of this disclosure, illustrating all its features, willnow be discussed in detail. The words “comprising,” “having,”“containing,” and “including,” and other forms thereof, are intended tobe open ended in that an item or items following any one of these wordsis not meant to be an exhaustive listing of such item or items, or meantto be limited to only the listed item or items. It must also be notedthat as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,”“an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearlydictates otherwise. Although any system and method to identify abusiness opportunity from a set of business opportunities associatedwith an organization for cognitive decision making process, similar orequivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice ortesting of embodiments of the present disclosure, the exemplary, systemand method to identify a business opportunity from a set of businessopportunities associated with an organization for cognitive decisionmaking process are now described.

Various modifications to the embodiment will be readily apparent tothose skilled in the art and the generic principles herein may beapplied to other embodiments to synthesis a business opportunityidentified from a set of business opportunities corresponding to anorganization for a cognitive decision-making process. However, one ofordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that the presentdisclosure to identify a business opportunity from a set of businessopportunities associated with an organization for cognitive decisionmaking process is not intended to be limited to the embodimentsdescribed, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with theprinciples and features described herein.

In the present disclosure, a business opportunity may be understood as atransient circumstance that comes along the way of a business operationand which needs to be handled strategically in order to promote thebusiness. In other words, the business opportunity may be understood asan opportunity for an organization to gain a profit, reduce a loss, ormaintain its hold in the market. Though organization identify thesebusiness opportunities, however identifying these business opportunitiesin real time or even predicting the business opportunities is the key tosuccess. It may be noted that the opportunity sensing system mayidentify a business opportunity for which a strategy may be implemented.However, for implementing the strategy effective a basis of identifyingthe business opportunity is necessary. In addition, accuracy iscritical, as wrong identification may lead to loss of time and effort.Therefore, it becomes further important to provide the symptom of thebusiness opportunity along with the root cause of the businessopportunity to the user and the system implementing a cognitive decisionmaking process.

In one embodiment, a system and a method to identify a businessopportunity from a set of business opportunities associated with anorganization for cognitive decision making process, is disclosed. In theembodiment a set of business opportunities may be received from a userwithin an organization and one or more symptoms associated with the oneor more business opportunities from the set of business opportunitiesmay be generated based on a and metadata. In one example, the metadatamay comprise descriptions of data streams to be examined, business goalsto be considered, business policies to be followed, predefinedthresholds to be used for determining interestingness of theopportunity. In one example, the description of real-time data stream tobe filtered may comprise the location of data origin, data type, datastructure, frequency of data. Further business goal and businesspolicies may be set by the organization. Furthermore, predefinedthreshold of interestingness of the opportunity ness may be an amount ofprofit/loss that the business opportunity indicates, or an importance ofa business opportunity. In one example, the symptoms may comprisepatterns and instructions for collecting data corresponding to thepattern. Upon generating the one or more symptoms, a matrix mapping thebusiness opportunity and the symptoms is generated. In one example,multiple business opportunity may be mapped to a single symptom andvices versa.

Further, in the embodiment, a set of batch data associated may bereceived. In one example, the set of batch data may be developed basedon filtering of real time data using the one or more symptoms and themetadata. Upon receiving, addition metadata data associated with thebusiness opportunity may be obtained, wherein the metadata comprises oneor more of historical data associated with the symptom, historical dataassociated with object being analyzed by the symptom for example,customers, location, competitors and the like. Further to obtaining, oneor more symptoms for the set of symptoms may be detected based onanalysis of the set of data and the metadata. In one example, thedetection may be understood as eliminating errors, deviations, filteringdata associated with the one or more symptom in the batch data.Subsequently, a reason associated with the detected one or more symptommay be generated based on execution of a root cause analysis methodologyusing the metadata data. In one example, the reasons for the existenceof the symptom may be selected from a predefined template based on theanalysis of the set of batch data and the metadata. In one example, themetadata may comprise indications and data points of the reason of thesymptoms. In the example, the indications and data points in themetadata is extrapolated to generate a reason. The reason may be one ofa present/absent or conclusive/inconclusive. Further, the reason maycomprise a write up generated using natural language process or selectedfrom a template and indications/data points from the metadata. Furtherto generating, a business opportunity may be identified from the set ofbusiness based on the generated reason. In one example, if the generatedreason is yes or conclusive the business opportunity associated with thereason is identified.

In the embodiment, upon identifying the one or more symptoms detected,and the reason generated may be appended to the business opportunity.Further, upon receiving one or more requests from the user a status ofbusiness opportunity identification, list of error logs, the businessopportunity, one or more symptoms, and the reason may be displayed tothe user. Furthermore, a report may be generated based on the userrequest.

Referring now to FIG. 1, a network implementation 100 of an opportunitysensing system 102 to identify a business opportunity from a set ofbusiness opportunities associated with an organization for cognitivedecision-making process is disclosed. It may be understood that thepresent disclosure is explained considering that the opportunity sensingsystem 102 is implemented on a server 110. Further it may also beunderstood that the opportunity sensing system 102 may be implementedvariety of computing systems, such as a mobile communication device(such as a smartphone), a laptop computer, a desktop computer, anotebook, a workstation, a mainframe computer, a server, a networkserver, and the like. It will be understood that the opportunity sensingsystem 102 may be accessed by multiple users through one or more userdevices 104-1, 104-2 . . . 104-N. Examples of the user devices 104 mayinclude, but are not limited to, a portable computer, a personal digitalassistant, a handheld device, and a workstation. The user devices 104are communicatively coupled to the opportunity sensing system 102through a network 106. Further, the opportunity sensing system 102 maybe communicatively coupled to a knowledge database 112 though thenetwork 116.

In one implementation, the network 106 may be a wireless network, awired network or a combination thereof. The network 106 can beimplemented as one of the different types of networks, such as intranet,local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), the internet, and thelike. The network 106 may be either a dedicated network or a sharednetwork. The shared network represents an association of the differenttypes of networks that use a variety of protocols, for example,Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), Transmission ControlProtocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP), Wireless Application Protocol(WAP), and the like, to communicate with one another. Further, thenetwork 106 may include a variety of network devices, including routers,bridges, servers, computing devices, storage devices, and the like.

Referring now to FIG. 2, the opportunity sensing system 102 to identifya business opportunity from a set of business opportunities associatedwith an organization for cognitive decision-making process isillustrated in accordance with an embodiment of the present subjectmatter. In one embodiment, the opportunity sensing system 102 mayinclude at least one processor 202, an input/output (I/O) interface 204,and a memory 206. The at least one processor 202 may be implemented asone or more microprocessors, microcomputers, microcontrollers, digitalsignal processors, central processing units, state machines, logiccircuitries, and/or any devices that manipulate signals based onoperational instructions. Among other capabilities, the at least oneprocessor 202 is configured to fetch and execute computer-readableinstructions stored in the memory 206.

The I/O interface 204 may include a variety of software and hardwareinterfaces, for example, a web interface, a graphical user interface,and the like. The I/O interface 204 may allow the opportunity sensingsystem 102 to interact with the user directly or through the clientdevices 104. Further, the I/O interface 204 may enable the opportunitysensing system 102 to communicate with other computing devices, such asweb servers and external data servers (not shown). The I/O interface 204can facilitate multiple communications within a wide variety of networksand protocol types, including wired networks, for example, LAN, cable,etc., and wireless networks, such as WLAN, cellular, or satellite. TheI/O interface 204 may include one or more ports for connecting a numberof devices to one another or to another server.

The memory 206 may include any computer-readable medium or computerprogram product known in the art including, for example, volatilememory, such as static random access memory (SRAM) and dynamic randomaccess memory (DRAM), and/or non-volatile memory, such as read onlymemory (ROM), erasable programmable ROM, flash memories, hard disks,optical disks, and magnetic tapes. The memory 206 may include modules208 and data 210.

The modules 208 include routines, programs, objects, components, datastructures, etc., which perform particular tasks or implement particularabstract data types. In one implementation, the modules 208 may includean opportunity detection module 212, an opportunity synthesis module 214and other modules 216. Further, the opportunity detection module 212comprises symptoms module 222, and root cause verifier module 224. Theother modules 216 may include programs or coded instructions thatsupplement applications and functions of the opportunity sensing system102. The modules 208 described herein may be implemented as softwaremodules that may be executed in the cloud-based computing environment ofthe opportunity sensing system 102.

The data 210, amongst other things, serves as a repository for storingdata processed, received, and generated by one or more of the modules208. Further, the data may include system data 218, and other data 220.The other data 220 may include data generated as a result of theexecution of one or more modules in the other modules 216.

In one implementation, the opportunity sensing system 102 addresses thechallenges observed in the existing art. More specifically, theopportunity sensing system 102 facilitates identification of thebusiness opportunity (hereinafter alternatively referred to asopportunity) from a tremendous amount of real time data with reasoningfor identifying the business opportunity and its impact to theorganization. Further, the opportunity sensing system 102 synthesizes abusiness opportunity identified from a set of business opportunitiescorresponding to an organization for a cognitive decision-makingprocess. Examples of business opportunity may be “Preventing Churn ofCustomers Opportunity” “Excess Stock Prevention Opportunity” in shoppingmall. In one aspect, the excess stock has a cost associated with it andthus, preventing it will cause a net saving. In other aspect, preventingchurn of customer has a loss of revenue over the life span of thecustomer associated with it. Thus upon identifying the businessopportunity along with its reason is critical so that a user may takefurther action.

In the embodiment, the opportunity detection module 212 may receive aset of business opportunities from a user within an organization andgenerate one or more symptoms associated with the one or more businessopportunities from the set of business opportunities based on metadata.In one example, the metadata may comprise descriptions of data streamsto be examined, business goals to be considered, business policies to befollowed, predefined thresholds to be used for determininginterestingness of the opportunity. In one example, the description ofreal-time data stream to be filtered may comprise the location of dataorigin, data type, data structure, frequency of data. Further businessgoal and business policies may be set by the organization. Furthermore,predefined threshold of interestingness of the opportunity ness may bean amount of profit/loss that the business opportunity indicates, or animportance of a business opportunity. In one example, the symptoms maycomprise patterns and instructions for collecting data corresponding tothe pattern. Upon generating the one or more symptoms, the opportunitydetection module 212 may generate a matrix mapping the businessopportunity and the symptoms. In one example, multiple businessopportunity may be mapped to a single symptom and vice versa.

Referring to the business opportunity of customer churn prevention. Inthe example, the opportunity detection module 212 upon receiving thecustomer churn prevention opportunity may generate symptoms comprisingpatterns such as “customers not buying from last 5 day” “customersreducing total amount of spend over last 3 transaction”. The duration of“last 5 day” and “last 3 transactions” may be predefined or may beobtained from the user or the general knowledge. Further, the symptomsmay comprises instructions to collect database on the symptoms.

Further, in the embodiment, the symptoms module 222 may receive a set ofbatch data associated with the business opportunity and corresponding tothe symptoms. In one example, the set of batch data may be developedbased on filtering of real time data using the one or more symptoms.Upon receiving, the symptoms module 222 may obtain addition metadatadata associated with the business opportunity. In one example, themetadata may comprise one or more of historical data associated with thesymptom, historical data associated with object being analyzed by thesymptom for example, customers, location, competitors and the like.Further to obtaining, the symptoms module 222 may detect one or moresymptoms for the set of symptoms based on analysis of the set of dataand the metadata. In one example, the detection may be understood aseliminating errors, deviations, filtering data associated with the oneor more symptom in the batch data.

Referring back to the business opportunity of customer churn prevention.In the example the symptoms module 222 may receive a set of batch data,comprising a list of customers, associated with customer churnprevention opportunity and corresponding to the symptom “customers notbuying from last 5 day” “customers reducing total amount of spend overlast 3 transaction”. Further, the set of batch data may be developedbased on filtering of real time data from point of sale units located inthe shopping mall using the symptoms. Upon receiving, the symptomsmodule 222 may obtain metadata data associated with the businessopportunity. In one example, the metadata may comprise one or more ofhistorical data associated with the symptom, historical data associatedwith customers, profile data of the customers, computers data. Furtherto obtaining, the symptoms module 222 may detect one or more customersfalling in the symptom “customers not buying from last 5 day” anddeviating from their regular buying pattern. For example, John, whoregularly buys after 3 days and Ron who buys after every 4 days, bothhave not bought from last 5 days is detected, whereas Jane who regularlybuys every week is filtered, as she has not deviated. For identifyingchurn of Jane, another churn opportunity with a symptom of “customersnot buying from last 7 days” may be generated.

Furthermore, in the embodiment, the root cause verifier module 224 maygenerate a reason associated with the detected one or more symptom, forexample why the symptom has occurred, based on execution of a root causeanalysis methodology using the metadata data. In one example, thereasons for the existence of the symptom may be selected from apredefined template based on the analysis of the set of batch data andthe metadata. In one example, the metadata may comprise indications anddata points of the reason of the symptoms. In the example, theindications and data points in the metadata may be extrapolated togenerate a reason using the root cause analysis methodology. Root causeanalysis may be understood a method of problem solving used foridentifying the root causes of a problem/symptom. In other mores, theprimary aim of root cause analysis is to identify the factors thatresulted in the nature, the magnitude, the location, and the timing ofthe symptom. The reason may be one of a present/absent orconclusive/inconclusive. Further, the reason may comprise a write upgenerated using natural language process or selected from a templet andindications/data points from the metadata. Further to generating, theroot cause verifier module 224 may identify a business opportunity fromthe set of business based on the generated reason. In one example, ifthe generated reason is yes or conclusive the business opportunityassociated with the reason is identified.

Referring again to the business opportunity of customer churnprevention. In the example the root cause verifier module 224 maygenerate a reason associated with each of one or more customers fallingin the symptom “customers not buying from last 5 day” and deviating fromtheir regular buying pattern, for example John and Ron. In one example,the reason may comprise data on why the symptom has occurred, based onexecution of a root cause analysis methodology using the metadata data.In John, the metadata associated with the Jane may comprise his detailsas he is a student in the university and he is from Germany. Further,the metadata may comprise local news and information such as theuniversity is closed for Christmas. The root cause verifier module 224may generate a reason based on the metadata that John may be on vacationand hence is not buying. Further, in case of Ron, the metadata maycomprise data indicating that he is working in a local office and isfrom the local area. Further, the metadata may have local informationsuch that the office has not declared any holidays. The root causeverifier module 224 may generate a reason that no reason for deviationavailable and inconclusive. Further to generating, the root causeverifier module 224 may identify that Ron is a business opportunitybased on the generated reason. Further, the user of the organization maygenerate a strategy to prevent Ron's churning.

In the embodiment, upon identifying the opportunity detection module 212may append the one or more symptoms detected, and the reason generatedto the business opportunity. Further, upon receiving one or morerequests from the user the opportunity detection module 212 may displaya status of business opportunity identification, list of error logs, thebusiness opportunity, one or more symptoms, and the reason to the user.Furthermore, the opportunity detection module 212 may generate a reportbased on the user request.

Upon identifying data, the opportunity synthesis module 214 may generatea human readable document corresponding to the identified businessopportunity using natural language generation. The document maycomprises detail description on the business opportunity, the symptomsand the reason for its identification. Referring to the example, ofchurn prevention, the opportunity synthesis module 214 may generate adocument identifying churn of customers and comprising a list of thecustomer that may churn and the reasons of churn.

Now refereeing to the rest of the figures. FIG. 3 illustrates a messageflow in the opportunity sensing system, 102, and FIG. 4 illustrates amessage flow in the opportunity detection system. Further, thesucceeding detailed description of the opportunity sensing system 102along with other components, their interactions is explained byreferring to FIG. 2, FIG. 3 and FIG. 4.

In one implementation, an opportunity sensing system 102 receives streamof opportunity input packages, interchangeably referred to as a set ofbatch data from external Perceptual System Module (not shown). Further,table 1 below shows top-level message types used by opportunity sensingsystem 102.

TABLE 1 Top-level message types used by Opportunity sensing systemTop-Level Message Types used by Opportunity sensing system 102 MessageProducer Consumer # Type Module Module Description 1 Sensing- PerceptualOpportunity This message triggers the Start System sensing sensing,activity for a new Module system batch of input data. 2 O-D-StartOpportunity Opportunity Messages of this type are (Opportunity sensingDetection emitted for each Detection system Module Opportunity Type forStart) detecting opportunity on the received batch of input data by theopportunity sensing system. 3 O-D-Done Opportunity Opportunity Thismessage is emitted (Opportunity Detection sensing when the detectionDetection Module system activity is completed for Done) an opportunitytype. It can have the response status of either FOUND or NOT-FOUND. 4O-S-Start Opportunity Opportunity This message is emitted (Opportunitysensing Synthesis after receiving an O-D- Synthesis system Module Donemessage with Start) response status FOUND. 5 O-S-Done OpportunityOpportunity This message is emitted (Opportunity Synthesis sensing aftercompletion of Synthesis Module system opportunity synthesis Done) for anew opportunity instance. 6 Strategy- Opportunity Strategy This messagetriggers the Start sensing Planning start of strategy planning systemModule for a new opportunity instance.

In the implementation, opportunity sensing system 102 function inmultiple phases such as initiation phase, execution phase terminationphase. In one example, below description explains an overview of thebehavior of the opportunity sensing system 102 through various phases.In one example of the initialization phase, upon start opportunitysensing system 102 performs the following initialization activities:

/* Set up connections to external message queues */

-   -   1. Using Messaging service, register as consumer to        Sensing-Start messages queue, created by Opportunity sensing        System.    -   2. Using Messaging service, register as producer to        Strategy-Start messages queue created by Opportunity sensing        System.

/* Set up message queues for communication with internal components */

-   -   3. Using messaging service, create O-D-Start, O-D-Done,        O-S-Start, and O-S-Done message queues.    -   4. Register as producer to O-D-Start and O-S-Start message        queues    -   5. Register as consumer to O-D-Done and O-S-Done message queues

/* Instantiate Opportunity Type Knowledge Objects */

-   -   6. Get the count; say #o-types, of pre-defined opportunity types        in the system from the Knowledge database 112.    -   7. Create an Opportunity Types Knowledge Object (OTS-KO) in        memory, as a collection of #o-types Opportunity Type Knowledge        Objects. Each Opportunity Type Knowledge Object (OT-KO) follows        Opportunity Type Knowledge Schema and has a unique identifier        OT-ID that can be used to reference the corresponding object.    -   8. Initialize all Opportunity Type Knowledge Objects by reading        the opportunity type specifications from the Knowledge Module.        In one example, opportunity type specifications may be read once        in its entirety from the knowledge base stored on a storage        device, when the opportunity detection module is started and        cached in memory (interchangeably referred to as system data        218) for subsequent reference. Alternatively, you may keep in        memory OT-ID and partial information may be keep in the memory        about opportunity type and fetch the rest from knowledge        database 112 as needed.

/* Start Internal Component Modules */

-   -   9. Start Opportunity detection module 212, passing it the        reference to OTS-KO, the Opportunity Types Knowledge Object.    -   10. Start Opportunity Synthesis Module 214, passing it the        reference to OTS-KO, the Opportunity Types Knowledge Object.

In one example in the execution phase, after completing initializationactivities, opportunity-sensing system 102 executes the followingconcurrent activities.

/* Listen to normal messages from component modules 212 and 214 */

-   -   11. Upon receiving an O-D-Done (opportunity detection done)        message from Opportunity Detection Module, perform the        following:        -   a. If the message response status is NOT FOUND, do nothing.        -   b. If the message response status is FOUND, create a new            message O-S-start message with reference to object . . . .            Append the O-S-Start message to the O-S-Start messages            queue.

-   2. Upon receiving an O-S-Done (opportunity synthesis done), create a    new Strategy-Start message, include a reference and append the    message to Strategy-Start messages queue.

/* Listen to exception/error messages from component modules 212 and 214*/

-   -   12. Upon receiving an exception message from Opportunity        detection module 214 or Opportunity Synthesis Module 214,        perform the following:        -   a. If exception can be handled at Opportunity Sensing System            102 level, invoke exception-handling mechanism of the            Opportunity Sensing Mechanism. This may involve stopping and            restarting component modules 212 and/or 214. Save error and            recovery logs using logging service.

/* Listen to administrative requests */

-   -   13. Administrative user can interact with Opportunity Sensing        System 102 to:        -   a. View the status of opportunity sensing progress        -   b. View errors and logs        -   c. Stop and restart Opportunity detection module 212        -   d. Stop and restart Opportunity Synthesis Module 214

In one example in the termination phase Opportunity Sensing System 102continues to be active after initialization until, the system itselfhalts or there is some fault in the system that brings it down. In thelatter case, the systems fault-recovery mechanism kicks in to restartOpportunity Sensing System 102.

Opportunity Detection Module 212

Opportunity detection module 212 is created and started (restarted incase of failures) by the opportunity sensing system 102. Opportunitydetection module 212 is responsible for sensing an opportunity in theopportunity input package. It does so by invoking two othermodules—Symptoms Module 222 and Root-Cause Verifier Module 224.

Opportunity detection module 212 instantiates Symptoms Module 222 androot cause verifier module 224 as needed or may activate a pool ofSymptoms Modules 212 and root cause verifier 224 modules for eachopportunity type, during its initialization phase. Further, in onexample, table 2 shows top-level message types used by opportunitydetection module 212.

TABLE 2 Top-level message type used by opportunity detection moduleMessage Types used by Opportunity detection module 212 Message ProducerConsumer # Type Module Module Description 1 O-D-Start OpportunityOpportunity This message triggers (Opportunity sensing Detectionopportunity detection Detection system 102 Module 212 pipeline Start) 2S-D-Start Opportunity Symptoms This message triggers (Symptoms DetectionDetector symptoms detection for an Detection Module 212 Module 222opportunity type by a Start) Symptoms Module 3 S-D-Done SymptomsOpportunity This message is emitted (Symptoms Module 222 Detection aftercompletion after Detection Module 212 receiving S-D-Start. The Done)status of the message is either FOUND or NOT FOUND. 4 R-V-StartOpportunity Root Cause This message triggers root- (Root Cause DetectionVerifier cause verification activity Verification Module 212 Module 224for an opportunity type by a Start) root cause verifier module. Thismessage is emitted after an S-D-Done message with FOUND status. 5R-V-Done Root Cause Opportunity This message is emitted (Root CauseVerifier Detection after completion of root Verification DetectionModule 212 cause verification. The Done) Module 224 status of themessage is either VERIFIED or NOT VERIFIED. 6 O-D-Done OpportunityOpportunity This message is emitted (Opportunity Detection sensing afterreceiving an R-V-Done Synthesis Module 212 system 102 message. Start)Its response status is set to FOUND, if the response status of R-V-DONEmessage response status is VERIFIED otherwise it is set to NOT-FOUND.

In the implementation, opportunity detection system 212 function inmultiple phases such as initiation phase, execution phase terminationphase. In one example, below description explains an overview of thebehavior of the opportunity detection system 212 through various phases.In one example of the initialization phase, upon start opportunitydetection system 102 performs the following initialization activities:

/* Set up connections to external message queues */

-   -   1. Using Messaging service, register as consumer to O-D-Start        messages queue, created by Opportunity Sensing System.    -   2. Using Messaging service, register as producer to O-D-Done        messages queue created by Opportunity Sensing System.

/* Set up message queues for communication with instances of internalcomponents 222 and 224* / In one example, if there are 4 opportunitytypes in OTS-KO, there will be 20 message queues created, 4 for eachopportunity type

-   -   3. For entries in Opportunity Types Knowledge Object (OTS-KO):        -   a. Get the next entry (Opportunity Type Knowledge Object),            say OT-KO        -   b. Using messaging service, create S-D-Start, S-D-Done,            R-V-Start, and R-V-Done message queues for opportunity type            OT-KO.        -   c. Register as producer to S-D-Start and R-V-Start message            queues.        -   d. Register as consumer to S-D-Done and R-V-Done message            queues.

/* create instances of Symptoms Module 222 and Root Cause VerifierModule 224*/ in one example, if there are 4 opportunity types in OTS-KO,there will be 4 instances of each Symptoms Module 222 and Root CauseVerifier Module 224, one for each opportunity type)

-   -   4. For entries in Opportunity Types Knowledge Object (OTS-KO):        -   a. Get the next entry (Opportunity Type Knowledge Object),            say OT-KO        -   b. Start an instance of Symptoms Module 222 passing it the            reference to OT-KO        -   c. Start an instance of Root-Cause Verifier Module 224            passing it the reference to OT-KO

In one example at the execution phase, after completing initializationactivities, opportunity detection module 212 executes the followingactivities concurrently:

/* Listen to normal messages from component modules 222 and 224*/

-   -   5. Upon receiving a S-D-Done (symptoms detection done) message        from a Symptoms Module 222, perform the following:        -   a. If the response status is NOT FOUND, emit an O-D-Done            (opportunity detection done) message with response status            set to NOT-FOUND.        -   b. If the response status is FOUND, emit an R-V-Start (Root            Cause Verification Start) message.    -   6. Upon receiving a R-V-Done (Root Cause Verification Message        Done) message from a Root Cause Verifier Module 224, perform the        following:        -   a. If the response status is VERIFIED, create a new            Opportunity Instance Knowledge Object of the Opportunity            Type in question and initialize its fields and emit an            O-D-Done (Opportunity Detection Done) message with response            status set to FOUND        -   b. If the response status is NOT VERIFIED, emit an O-D-Done            (opportunity detection done) message with response status            set to NOT-FOUND.

/* Listen to exception/error messages from component modules 222 and224*/

-   -   7. Upon receiving an exception message from Symptoms Detection        Module 222 or Root Cause Verifier Module 224, perform the        following:        -   a. If exception can be handled at Opportunity Detection            Module 212 level, invoke exception-handling mechanism of the            Opportunity Detection Module 212. This may involve stopping            and restarting Symptoms Module 222 and Root Cause Verifier            Module 224; otherwise forward an exception message to            Opportunity Sensing System 102. Save error and recovery logs            using logging service.

/* Listen to administrative requests */

-   -   8. Administrative user can interact with Opportunity Detection        Module 212 to:        -   a. View the status of opportunity detection progress        -   b. View errors and logs        -   c. Stop and restart Symptoms Module 222        -   d. Stop and restart Root Cause Verifier Modules 224

In one example in the termination phase opportunity detection module 212continues to be active after initialization until, the ODS itself haltsor there is some fault in the system which brings it down. In the lattercase, the systems fault-recovery mechanism kicks in to restartOpportunity Detection Module 212.

Symptoms Module 222

In one implementation, several Symptoms Modules 222 may be runningconcurrently in the opportunity sensing system 102. Each such module isassociated with an opportunity type. In a simple embodiment, there isone symptom detector module 222 for each opportunity type. In alternateembodiments, several Symptoms Modules 222 can be associated with thesame opportunity type. In addition, one symptom detector module 222 canalso be associated with multiple opportunity types.

Further, Symptoms Modules 22 can run on a single machine or it can be adistributed program running on a cluster of machines. All instances ofSymptoms Modules 222 can be started in parallel on different machines ina cluster of machines. One or more Symptoms Modules can also be startedon a single machine. In one example, Symptoms Module 222 acceptsS-D-Start (Symptoms Detection Start) message with a reference toOpportunity Input Knowledge Object and after execution, it emits eitherS-D-Done (Symptoms Detection Done) message with response status set toFOUND or NOT-FOUND.

In the implementation, Symptoms Module 222 function in multiple phasessuch as initiation phase, execution phase termination phase. In oneexample, below description explains an overview of the behavior of theSymptoms Module 222 through various phases. In one example of theinitialization phase, upon start Symptoms Module 222 performs thefollowing initialization activities: In one example, let OT is theopportunity type associated with this instance (available from theparameter opportunity type knowledge object, OT-KO, passed with thestart request.)

/* set up connections to external message queues */

-   -   1. Using Messaging service, register as consumer to S-D-Start        messages queue for opportunity type OT, created by Opportunity        Detection Module 212.    -   2. Using Messaging service, register as producer to S-D-Done        messages queue for opportunity type OT, created by Opportunity        Detection Module 214.

/* configure symptoms detection pipeline code */

-   -   1. From the associated Opportunity Type Knowledge Object, OT-KO,        get the array of symptoms (OT-Symptoms) and/or the array of        methods/functions (OT-Symptom-Checking-Functions).        OT-Symptom-Checking-Functions are analytics programs that are        used to detect a well-defined pattern (corresponding to a        symptom) in opportunity input package.    -   2. Using the information from step 4, code symptoms detection        pipeline code in the symptoms detector instance.

Execution Phase—After initialization, Symptoms Module 222 runs in a loopperforming the following:

/* Listen to message S-D-Start (Symptoms Detection Start) fromOpportunity Detection Module 212 */

-   -   1. Upon receiving an S-D-Start message, perform the following:        -   a. Get Opportunity Input Knowledge Object (OI-KO)        -   b. Process OI-KO through symptoms detection pipeline        -   c. If one or more symptoms are detected, create a new            Opportunity Detection Knowledge Object (OD-KO), initialize            it with the detection information and emit an S-D-Done            (symptoms detection done) message with response status set            to FOUND.        -   d. If no-symptom is found, emit an S-D-Done (symptoms            detection done) message with response status set to            NOT-FOUND        -   e. Using logging service, log a symptoms detection record.

In one example in the termination phase Symptoms Module 222 may bestarted/restarted at the beginning of each iteration of the detectionloop and terminated at the end of the iteration. Alternately, theseprograms can be kept running waiting for the next iteration afterprocessing opportunity input package for the current iteration. If aSymptoms Module 222 halts because of failure, the systems fault-recoverymechanism kicks in to restart the symptoms detection module 222.

Root-Cause Verifier Module 224

In one implementation, a Root-Cause Verifier Module 224 performsadditional analysis after one or more symptoms have been detected in theopportunity input package by a symptoms detection module 222. Further,several Root-Cause Verifier modules 224 may be running concurrently inthe system. Each such module 224 is associated with an opportunity typeand a symptom. In one embodiment, there is a single Root-Cause Verifiermodule 224 for each opportunity type. In alternate embodiments, severalRoot-Cause Verifier modules 224 can be associated with the sameopportunity type. In addition, a single Root Cause Verifier module 224can also be associated with multiple opportunity types. In theimplementation, Root Cause Verifier modules 224 can run on a singlemachine or it can be a distributed program running on a cluster ofmachines. All instances of Root Cause Verifier modules 224 can bestarted in parallel on different machines in a cluster of machines. Oneor more Root Cause Verifier modules 224 can also be started on a singlemachine.

In one example, the Root Cause Verifier module 224 accepts R-V-Start(Root Cause Verification Start) message with references to OpportunityInput Knowledge Object (OI-KO) and Opportunity Detection KnowledgeObject (OD-KO) and after execution, it emits R-V-Done (Root CauseVerification Done) message with response status set to either VERIFIEDor NOT VERIFIED.

In the implementation, Root Cause Verifier modules 224 function inmultiple phases such as initiation phase, execution phase terminationphase. In one example, below description explains an overview of thebehavior of the Root Cause Verifier modules 224 through various phases.In one example of the initialization phase, upon start Root CauseVerifier module 224 performs the following initialization activities. Inone example, let OT be the opportunity type associated with thisinstance (available from the parameter opportunity type knowledgeobject, OT-KO, passed with the start request.)

/* set up connections to external message queues */

-   -   1. Using Messaging service, register as consumer to R-V-Start        messages queue for opportunity type OT, created by Opportunity        Detection Module.    -   2. Using Messaging service, register as producer to R-V-Done        messages queue for opportunity type OT, created by Opportunity        Detection Module.

/* configure root cause verification pipeline code */

-   -   1. From the associated Opportunity Type Knowledge Object, OT-KO,        get the array of root causes (OT-Root-Causes) and/or the array        of methods/functions (OT-Root-Cause-Checking-Functions).        OT-Root-Cause-Checking-Functions are analytics programs that are        used to detect a well-defined pattern (corresponding to a root        cause) in opportunity input package or the metadata.    -   2. Using the information from step 4, configure root cause        verification pipeline code in the root cause verifier.

In one example in the execution phase, after initialization, Root CauseVerifier Module 224 runs in a loop executing the following steps:

/* Listen to message R-V-Start (Root Cause Verification Start) fromOpportunity Detection Module 212 */

-   -   1. Upon receiving an R-V-Start message, perform the following:        -   a. Get Opportunity Input Knowledge Object (OI-KO) and            Opportunity Detection Knowledge Object (OD-KO).        -   b. Process OI-KO & OD-KO through root cause verification            pipeline        -   c. If one or more root causes are verified, update the            Opportunity Detection Knowledge Object (OD-KO) with            verification information and emit an R-V-Done (root cause            verification done) message with response status set to            VERIFIED.        -   d. If no root cause is verified, emit an R-V-Done (root            cause verification done) message with response status set to            NOT-VERIFIED.        -   e. Using logging service, log a root cause verification            record.

In one example in the termination phase, Root Cause Verifier 224 modulesmay be started/restarted at the beginning of each iteration of thedetection loop and terminated at the end of the iteration. Alternately,these programs can be kept running waiting for the next iteration afterprocessing opportunity input package for the current iteration. If aroot cause verifier module 224 halts because of failure, the systemsfault-recovery mechanism kicks in to restart the Root Cause VerifierModule 224.

Referring now to FIG. 5, a method 500 to identify a business opportunityfrom a set of business opportunities associated with an organization forcognitive decision-making process, is disclosed in accordance with anembodiment of the present subject matter. The method 400 to identify abusiness opportunity from a set of business opportunities associatedwith an organization for cognitive decision-making process may bedescribed in the general context of device executable instructions.Generally, device executable instructions can include routines,programs, objects, components, data structures, procedures, modules,functions, and the like, that perform particular functions or implementparticular abstract data types. The method 500 to identify a businessopportunity from a set of business opportunities associated with anorganization for cognitive decision-making process may also be practicedin a distributed computing environment where functions are performed byremote processing systems that are linked through a communicationsnetwork. In a distributed computing environment, computer executableinstructions may be located in both local and remote computer storagemedia, including memory storage systems.

The order in which the method 500 to identify a business opportunityfrom a set of business opportunities associated with an organization forcognitive decision-making process is described is not intended to beconstrued as a limitation, and any number of the described method blockscan be combined in any order to implement the method 500 or alternatemethods. Additionally, individual blocks may be deleted from the method500 without departing from the spirit and scope of the subject matterdescribed herein. Furthermore, the method 500 can be implemented in anysuitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. However,for ease of explanation, in the embodiments described below, the method500 to identify a business opportunity from a set of businessopportunities associated with an organization for cognitivedecision-making process may be considered to be implemented in theabove-described opportunity sensing system 102.

At block 402, a set of batch data associated with a set of symptomsindicative of a business opportunity from a set of businessopportunities associated with an organization may be received. In oneexample, each of the one or more symptoms may comprise a pattern andinstruction to collate data associated with the pattern, and the set ofbatch data may comprise data filtered from a real-time stream of databased on the one or more symptoms. In one embodiment, the symptomsmodule 222 may receive a set of batch data. Further, the symptoms module222 may store the set of batch data in the system data 218.

At block 404, metadata data associated with the business opportunity maybe obtained. In one example, the metadata comprises one or more ofhistorical data associated with the one or more symptom. In oneembodiment, the symptoms module 222 may obtain metadata data. Further,the symptoms module 222 may store the metadata in the system data 218.

At block 406, one or more symptoms for the set of symptoms may bedetected based on analysis of the first set of data and the metadata. Inone embodiment, the symptoms module 222 may detect one or more symptomsfor the set of symptoms. Further, the symptoms module 222 may store theone or more symptoms in the system data 218.

At block 408, a reason associated with the detected one or more symptommay be generated based on execution of a root cause analysis methodologyusing the metadata data. In one embodiment, the root cause verifiermodule 224 may generate reason for the symptom. Further, the root causeverifier module 224 may store the reason in the system data 218.

At block 410, a business opportunity may be identified from the set ofbusiness based on the generated reason. In one embodiment, the rootcause verifier module 224 may identify the business opportunity.Further, the root cause verifier module 224 may store the businessopportunity in the system data 218.

Although implementations for methods and systems to identify a businessopportunity from a set of business opportunities associated with anorganization for cognitive decision making process have been describedin language specific to structural features and/or methods, it is to beunderstood that the appended claims are not necessarily limited to thespecific features or methods to identify a business opportunity from aset of business opportunities associated with an organization forcognitive decision making process described. Rather, the specificfeatures and methods are disclosed as examples of implementations toidentify a business opportunity from a set of business opportunitiesassociated with an organization for cognitive decision-making process.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method to identify an opportunity from aset of opportunities associated with an organization for cognitivedecision making process, wherein the method comprises: receiving, by aprocessor, a set of batch data associated with one or more symptomsindicative of an opportunity type from a set of opportunities associatedwith an organization, wherein each symptom of the one or more symptomscomprises a pattern and an instruction to collate data associated withthe pattern, and wherein the set of batch data comprises data filteredfrom a real-time stream of data based on the one or more symptoms;obtaining, by the processor, metadata associated with the opportunitytype, wherein the metadata comprises one or more of historical dataassociated with the one or more symptoms; identifying, by the processor,a symptom of the one or more symptoms based on an analysis of the set ofthe batch data and the metadata, wherein the identification indicateseliminating errors, deviations, filtering data associated with the oneor more symptoms in the set of the batch data; generating, by theprocessor, a reason associated with the symptom identified based on anexecution of a root cause analysis methodology using the metadata,wherein the reason associated with the symptom is selected from apredefined template based on the analysis of the set of batch data andthe metadata, and wherein the reason associated with the symptom isgenerated upon extrapolating data points in the metadata using the rootcause analysis methodology; identifying, by the processor, anopportunity in real time from the opportunity type based on the reasonassociated with the symptom, wherein the opportunity is identified usinga cognitive decision making process; appending, by the processor, theone or more symptoms identified, and the reason generated to theopportunity; and automatically generating, by the processor, a documentrelated to the identified opportunity using a natural languagegenerator, wherein the document contains a description of theopportunity, the one or more symptoms, and the reason associated withthe symptom.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, bythe processor, a set of opportunities from a user within anorganization; and generating, by the processor, the one or more symptomsassociated with one or more opportunity types from the set ofopportunities based on a predefined threshold.
 3. The method of claim 1,further comprising: receiving, by the processor, one or more requestsfor the user, wherein the one or more requests comprise status ofopportunity identification, list of error logs; and generating, by theprocessor, a reported based on the one or more requests.
 4. The methodof claim 1, wherein the metadata comprises one or more descriptions ofdata streams to be examined, goals to be considered, policies to befollowed and thresholds to be used for determining interestingness ofthe opportunity.
 5. An opportunity sensing system to identify anopportunity from a set of opportunities associated with an organizationfor cognitive decision making process, wherein the opportunity sensingsystem comprising: a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor,wherein the processor is capable of executing a plurality of modulesstored in the memory, and wherein the plurality of modules comprising:receiving a set of batch data associated with one or more symptomsindicative of an opportunity type from a set of opportunities associatedwith an organization, wherein each symptom of the one or more symptomscomprises a pattern and an instruction to collate data associated withthe pattern, and wherein the set of batch data comprises data filteredfrom a real-time stream of data based on the one or more symptoms;obtaining metadata associated with the opportunity type, wherein themetadata comprises one or more of historical data associated with theone or more symptoms; identifying a symptom of the one or more symptomsbased on an analysis of the set of the batch data and the metadata,wherein the identification indicates eliminating errors, deviations,filtering data associated with the one or more symptoms in the set ofthe batch data; generating a reason associated with the symptomidentified based on an execution of a root cause analysis methodologyusing the metadata, wherein the reason associated with the symptom isselected from a predefined template based on the analysis of the set ofbatch data and the metadata, and wherein the reason associated with thesymptom is generated upon extrapolating data points in the metadatausing the root cause analysis methodology; identifying an opportunity inreal time from the opportunity type based on the generated reason,wherein the opportunity is identified using a cognitive decision makingprocess; appending the one or more symptoms identified and the reasonassociated with the symptom to the opportunity; and automaticallygenerating a document related to the identified opportunity usingnatural language generator, wherein the document contains a descriptionof the opportunity, the symptoms, and the reason associated with thesymptom.
 6. The opportunity sensing system of claim 5, furthercomprising: receiving a set of opportunities from a user within anorganization; and generating the one or more symptoms associated withone or more opportunity types from the set of opportunities based on apredefined threshold.
 7. The opportunity sensing system of claim 5,further comprising: receiving one or more requests for the user, whereinthe one or more requests comprise status of opportunity identification,list of error logs; and generating a reported based on the one or morerequests.
 8. The opportunity sensing system of claim 5, wherein themetadata comprises one or more descriptions of data streams to beexamined, goals to be considered, policies to be followed and thresholdsto be used for determining interestingness of the opportunity.
 9. Anon-transitory computer readable medium embodying a program executablein a computing device to identify an opportunity from a set ofopportunities associated with an organization for cognitive decisionmaking process, wherein the program comprising a program code for:receiving a set of batch data with one or more symptoms indicative of anopportunity type from a set of opportunities associated with anorganization, wherein each symptom of the one or more symptoms comprisesa pattern and an instruction to collate data associated with thepattern, and wherein the set of batch data comprises data filtered froma real-time stream of data based on the one or more symptoms; obtainingmetadata associated with the opportunity type, wherein the metadatacomprises one or more of historical data associated with the one or moresymptoms; identifying a symptom of the one or more symptoms based on ananalysis of the set of the batch data and the metadata, wherein theidentification indicates eliminating errors, deviations, filtering dataassociated with the one or more symptoms in the set of the batch data;generating a reason associated with the symptom identified based on anexecution of a root cause analysis methodology using the metadata,wherein the reason associated with the symptom is selected from apredefined template based on the analysis of the set of batch data andthe metadata, and wherein the reason associated with the symptom isgenerated upon extrapolating data points in the metadata using the rootcause analysis methodology; identifying an opportunity in real time fromthe opportunity type based on the generated reason, wherein theopportunity is identified using a cognitive decision making process;appending the one or more symptoms identified and the reason associatedwith the symptom to the opportunity; and automatically generating adocument related to the identified opportunity using natural languagegenerator, wherein the document contains a description of theopportunity, the symptoms, and the reason associated with the symptom.10. The non-transitory computer readable of claim 9, further comprising:receiving a set of opportunities from a user within an organization; andgenerating one or more symptoms associated with one or more opportunitytypes from the set of opportunities based on a predefined threshold. 11.The non-transitory computer readable of claim 9, further comprising:receiving one or more requests for the user, wherein the one or morerequests comprise status of opportunity identification, list of errorlogs; and generating a reported based on the one or more requests. 12.The non-transitory computer readable of claim 9, wherein the metadatacomprises one or more descriptions of data streams to be examined, goalsto be considered, policies to be followed and thresholds to be used fordetermining interestingness of the opportunity.